In the world of theatre, few plays can match the enduring impact of Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman". As the 79th Annual Tony Awards approach, with the play's latest revival nominated for multiple awards, it's a fitting time to revisit the thoughts and insights of the playwright himself. In a 1987 interview with Terry Gross on Fresh Air, Miller offers a fascinating glimpse into the creative process behind one of America's most celebrated plays. But what's particularly intriguing is his candid discussion about his issues with Lee Strasburg's method of teaching.
A Play's Global Journey
Miller begins by reflecting on the global reception of "Death of a Salesman". He notes that the play has been performed in over 100 countries, a testament to its universal themes and powerful storytelling. "Salesman" explores the American Dream, the pursuit of success, and the consequences of a life driven by materialism. Miller's ability to capture these timeless themes has ensured the play's enduring appeal.
Working with Elia Kazan
The interview delves into Miller's collaboration with director Elia Kazan. Miller describes Kazan as a "tough, demanding, and brilliant" director who pushed him to explore the play's darker themes. "Salesman" is a play about a man's struggle to maintain his dignity and self-worth in a society that values success above all else. Kazan's direction helped bring this internal conflict to the forefront, making the play a powerful critique of the American Dream.
Issues with Lee Strasburg's Method
One of the most intriguing aspects of the interview is Miller's discussion of his issues with Lee Strasburg's method of teaching. Strasburg was a renowned acting coach who advocated for a method of training actors based on emotional recall and physical action. Miller, however, had reservations about this approach. "I didn't like the Strasburg method because it was too much about technique and not enough about the human being," he says. Miller believed that the play's emotional core lay in the characters' internal struggles, not in their physical movements.
In my opinion, Miller's critique of Strasburg's method highlights a fundamental tension in the world of theatre. While Strasburg's approach may have its merits, Miller's emphasis on the human being at the heart of the play is a powerful reminder of the importance of emotional depth in theatre. Personally, I think that the Strasburg method can be too focused on technique, potentially losing sight of the emotional truth that lies at the heart of a play.
A Play for Our Times
"Death of a Salesman" remains a relevant and powerful play, not just because of its exploration of the American Dream, but also because of its commentary on the human condition. Miller's ability to capture the complexities of the human psyche is a testament to his skill as a playwright. "Salesman" is a play that continues to resonate with audiences, inviting us to reflect on the values we hold dear and the consequences of our actions.
In conclusion, Arthur Miller's interview with Terry Gross offers a fascinating glimpse into the creative process behind one of America's most celebrated plays. His discussion of his issues with Lee Strasburg's method is a powerful reminder of the importance of emotional depth in theatre. "Death of a Salesman" remains a relevant and powerful play, inviting us to reflect on the human condition and the values we hold dear.
